Analysis of Motion in 2015 Sea Games Silat Competition
1. Faculty of Sport Science and Recreation, Universiti Teknolgi Mara Shah Alam, Selangor.
Abstract
This review is to discover the movement that the
individual utilized and how much of the time they utilized it in 2015 SEA games
in Singapore silat olahraga rivalry that came about the contrasts amongst
victors and failures in men's last class A and class E and Women’s finals class
C and class D. The initial step is by taking a recording video examination of
Men's class A Indonesia versus Vietnam,
taking after Men's class E last Vietnam versus Malaysia, Women's class C Vietnam
versus Indonesia and Women's class D Vietnam versus Malaysia in pesilat on Sea
Games 2015. The terms, silat olahraga is a fundamental essential of saving in
rivalry. For this examination, all of movement classifications will be utilized
including punch, kick, sweep, topple, avoid, self-discharge and so on., to
decide the exactness and recurrence of what number of fruitful procedure is
great. This strategy will happen when a two pesilat play out a battling in an
opposition. Pesilat can play out his system as much as they could such
utilizing kicking or punching to bring down the adversary. In the interim, the
point will be gathered by the rival down to the ground. At the point when the
rival is down the official or judge will guarantee that the adversary can't
battle back and the arbitrator will control the circumstance on battling
diversion because of major issue will happen. The Paired T-test will be
utilizations to examiner the number movement classifications between the two
warriors.
Keywords : Silat Olahraga, Batling, Martial art, Performance Analysis
Introduction
The 2015 Southeast Asian Games, formally known as the 28th SEA
Games was held in Singapore. It was the fourth time the nation had run the
amusements and the first run through since 1993. Singapore was initially
granted rights to run the SEA Games in 2011 after a few deferrals from 2007
because of improvement of the New National Stadium. An aggregate of 107 Silat
competitors from nine nations will contend in pencak silat at the 2015 SEA
Games including, Brunei, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore,
Thailand, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam. Silat is military specialties of East Asian
local that can have both creative and contact appear differently in relation to
the contact adaptation like both judo and taekwondo in that it is
weight-ordered, unarmed and full contact however with one of a kind development
patterns and scoring frameworks.
Little is thought about the physical and physiological attributes
that recognize more youthful and more seasoned silat contenders, or how these
create with age and development (Shapie, Oliver, O’Donoghue, & Tong, 2014). Silat is one of the recreations fused into
the South-east Asian Games and other region wide competitions. Sports (Silat
Olahraga) is a reasonably show day thought. The overall supervising body for
Silat (PERSILAT, T e Federation of International Silat) introduced the primary
general silat olahraga competition that were played out in Indonesi Jakarta in
80th (Parnabas, Shapie, & Parnabas, 2015).
Material and Method
A publicly available video recording of each country
that fought with Vietnam pesilat match in 2015 sea games Singapore from YouTube
was used for the analysis. The subject is consist of Men’s class A
final Indonesia versus Vietnam, Men’s class E final Vietnam versus Malaysia,
Women’s class C final Vietnam versus Indonesia and Women’s class D final
Vietnam versus Malaysia. Subsequent player motion analysis was carried out by 3
times recording repeated because some of the movement is fast and unable to
notate it. The method was used to identify 14 different types of event
performed by the pesilat contestants as well as the start and end of action
periods. The playback rate was reduced to 70% to allow accurate measurement of
each offensive and defensive movement category. The video could be paused and
played back frame-by frame for ease of use. Information could be entered into
the computer system using a ‘Mouse’, via representation on the screen of the
silat match, and specially designed screen functions for each exponent (red or
blue), action and outcome for each activity. The commencement and completion of
each individual action period was recorded and the duration was calculated by
spread sheet programming allowing durations (differences between action period
end and start times) to be computed. The frequency, mean duration and
percentage of total time were subsequently calculated in Statistical Package
for Social Science (SPSS). An intra-operator reliability study of fights was undertaken
to establish the reliability of the method.
Statistical analysis and Result
Final Men’s
Class A 50 KG Indonesia Versus Vietnam (Vietnam win)
Table 1 Frequency of
actions and outcomes recorded during silat match
Action
|
Outcome
|
|||
Hit elsewhere
|
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Total
|
|
Block
|
2
|
2
|
||
Block
and kick
|
||||
Block
and Punch
|
1
|
1
|
||
Block
and Sweep
|
2
|
2
|
||
Kick
|
15
|
3
|
10
|
28
|
Fake
Kick
|
8
|
8
|
16
|
|
Punch
|
1
|
3
|
7
|
11
|
Fake
Punch
|
4
|
8
|
12
|
|
Self-Release
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
Topple
|
1
|
1
|
14
|
16
|
Sweep
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
8
|
Catch
|
3
|
6
|
9
|
|
Dodge
|
10
|
9
|
19
|
|
Other
|
1
|
1
|
||
Total
|
21
|
40
|
70
|
131
|
Group Statistics in Action and Outcomes |
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
Indonesia
|
3
|
25.3333
|
15.69501
|
9.06152
|
Vietnam
|
3
|
22.6667
|
11.15049
|
6.43774
|
|
Table 2 Frequency Profile
of 2 Contestants
Exponent
|
punch
|
kick
|
topple
|
sweep
|
Block & sweep
|
Block & punch
|
Block &
kick
|
Total
|
Blue
|
3
|
19
|
10
|
3
|
35
|
|||
Red
|
8
|
21
|
6
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
43
|
|
Total
|
11
|
28
|
16
|
8
|
2
|
1
|
78
|
Final Men’s
Class E 70 KG Malaysia versus Vietnam (Vietnam lose)
Action
|
Outcome
|
|||
Hit elsewhere
|
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Total
|
|
Block
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
|
Block
and kick
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
|
Block
and Punch
|
||||
Block
and Sweep
|
1
|
9
|
9
|
|
Kick
|
5
|
7
|
19
|
31
|
Fake
Kick
|
8
|
8
|
||
Punch
|
6
|
2
|
6
|
14
|
Fake
Punch
|
1
|
1
|
||
Self-Release
|
||||
Topple
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
|
Sweep
|
2
|
2
|
||
Catch
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
|
Dodge
|
3
|
5
|
5
|
13
|
Other
|
1
|
1
|
||
Total
|
17
|
40
|
48
|
123
|
Table 3 Frequency of
actions and outcome recorded during silat match
Group Statistics for
action and outcomes
|
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
Vietnam
|
3
|
23.0000
|
14.42221
|
8.32666
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
15.0000
|
8.88819
|
5.13160
|
|
Table 4 Frequency profile
of 2 contestants
Exponent
|
punch
|
kick
|
topple
|
sweep
|
Block & sweep
|
Block & punch
|
Block &
kick
|
Total
|
Blue
|
10
|
3
|
1
|
10
|
3
|
27
|
||
Red
|
14
|
21
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
40
|
||
Total
|
14
|
31
|
5
|
2
|
10
|
5
|
67
|
Final
Women’s Class C 60KG Vietnam versus Indonesia (Vietnam win)
Table 5 Frequency of
actions and outcomes recorded in silat match
Action
|
Outcome
|
|||
Hit elsewhere
|
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Total
|
|
Block
|
3
|
7
|
5
|
15
|
Block
and kick
|
1
|
1
|
||
Block
and Punch
|
||||
Block
and Sweep
|
3
|
7
|
10
|
|
Kick
|
24
|
7
|
27
|
58
|
Fake
Kick
|
1
|
1
|
||
Punch
|
||||
Fake
Punch
|
||||
Self-Release
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
9
|
Topple
|
1
|
11
|
12
|
|
Sweep
|
||||
Catch
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Dodge
|
2
|
10
|
3
|
15
|
Other
|
||||
Total
|
31
|
35
|
54
|
123
|
Group Statistics for Action and Outcome |
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
Vietnam
|
3
|
18.6667
|
4.16333
|
2.40370
|
Indonesia
|
3
|
21.6667
|
9.86577
|
5.69600
|
|
Table 6 Frequency profile
of 2 contestants
Exponent
|
punch
|
kick
|
topple
|
sweep
|
Block & sweep
|
Block & punch
|
Block &
kick
|
Total
|
Blue
|
39
|
5
|
1
|
45
|
||||
Red
|
19
|
7
|
10
|
36
|
||||
Total
|
58
|
12
|
10
|
1
|
81
|
Final Women’s Class D 65 KG Vietnam
versus Malaysia (Vietnam lose)
Table 7 Frequency of
actions and outcomes during recorded during silat match
Action
|
Outcome
|
|||
Hit elsewhere
|
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Total
|
|
Block
|
2
|
5
|
7
|
14
|
Block
and kick
|
5
|
4
|
9
|
|
Block
and Punch
|
||||
Block
and Sweep
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Kick
|
22
|
24
|
13
|
59
|
Fake
Kick
|
2
|
2
|
||
Punch
|
10
|
18
|
2
|
20
|
Fake
Punch
|
||||
Self-Release
|
1
|
8
|
4
|
13
|
Topple
|
1
|
10
|
11
|
|
Sweep
|
1
|
1
|
||
Catch
|
6
|
16
|
22
|
|
Dodge
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|
Other
|
||||
Total
|
41
|
72
|
54
|
167
|
Group Statistics for Action and Outcomes |
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
Vietnam
|
3
|
28.6667
|
7.23418
|
4.17665
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
27.3333
|
9.60902
|
5.54777
|
|
Table 8 Frequency profile
of 2 contestants
Exponent
|
punch
|
kick
|
topple
|
sweep
|
Block & sweep
|
Block & punch
|
Block &
kick
|
Total
|
Blue
|
10
|
25
|
8
|
1
|
2
|
9
|
55
|
|
Red
|
10
|
34
|
3
|
1
|
58
|
|||
Total
|
20
|
59
|
11
|
1
|
2
|
10
|
113
|
Discussion
Independent
paired t-test is used to collect the data from 28th SEA Games
Singapore 2015, Final Men’s Class A 50 KG Indonesia Versus Vietnam, Final Men’s
Class E 70 KG Malaysia versus Vietnam, Final Women’s Class C 60KG Vietnam
versus Indonesia, Final Women’s Class D 65 KG Vietnam
versus Malaysia. The first result of Men’s Class A has shown that the red from Vietnam
won by more attacking such as punching, kicking and sweeping compared to the
blue which is Indonesia. We can see that athlete at the blue corner has the
speed in kicking and toppling compared to red corner but still weak in
defencing. The 2nd result Final Men’s Class E 70 KG Malaysia versus Vietnam,
The blue corner from Malaysia won the game, Vietnam made more attacking but Malaysia won by
defencing to attack at the same time. The 3rd game Final Women’s Class C 60KG
Vietnam versus Indonesia, Vietnam won the game by collecting point using
kicking and hit target. The 4th table Final Women’s Class D 65 KG
Vietnam versus Malaysia, Malaysia won the game made an exact motion in
collecting point as Malaysian athlete MOHF AL JUFFERI JAMARI by blocking and
attacking at the same time. The mean values for overall motion of action and
outcomes for, Final Men’s Class A Vietnam has the mean of 22.66 less than
Indonesia which is 25.33. The Final Men’s Class E shown that Vietnam has higher
mean 23 compare to Malaysia 15. On the 3rd table which is Final
Women’s Class C, the mean of Vietnam is slightly less than Indonesia which is
18.67 and 21.67. The 4th table Vietnam has the mean of 28.67 and
Malaysia is 27.33 a little bit higher than Malaysia. All the result shown that,
higher means lost the game.
In summary, Vietnam athletes have been
chosen to see the factor of losing and winning in analysing their motion
category that they used, In the 1st game Final Men’s Class A,
individual Vietnam won by punching hit target, aggressively kicking hit target
frequently and toppling that the mean between Indonesia is M (11.33) over M
(8.33) and the standard deviation is SD (8.5) over SD (9.24). The 2nd
table Final Men’s Class E shown that Vietnam loses the game by Malaysia.
Vietnam using frequent attacking such punching and kicking but most of the
attack hit elsewhere and not the target, the mean and standard deviation is
slightly better than Malaysia which is M (17.5) and SD (4.95) over Malaysia M
(5) and SD (7.07) in punching and kicking. The mistake that Vietnam did is less
self-release. They focus so much on punching and kicking that the Malaysia have
been waiting to catch and straight down to swept the Vietnam athlete. The 3rd
table, Final Women Class C, Vietnam won the game by Indonesia. The factor that
Vietnam won is by collecting point on kick hit target that the mean is M (39)
over M (19). The Vietnam athlete has significant speed in kicking. The 4th
table shown that Vietnam loses the game by Malaysia. Vietnam frequently using
kicking on hit target but weak in defencing and lack of self-release skill that
they easily got toppled and swept by Malaysia athlete.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Vietnam winner’s team Men’s Class A and
Women’s Class C have no problems in terms of motion skill, technical and
tactical skills. The thing that they need to improve is to see and to learn the
weakness of their opponent. For the losing team in Vietnam, such Men’s Class E
need to improve on self-release and defencing since the athletes frequently
being block and swept away by opponent. Defencing is important for locking the
opponent to get a point and the Vietnam athletes in this category need to have
speed and balancing because the movement that he did is to slow that able for
the opponent to catch or block. The 2nd losing team Vietnam Women’s
Class D is same as the Men’s class E, she needs to improve more on balancing,
self-release and blocking. She has the speed in kicking but no strength that
gives the chances for the opponent to catch the leg that made her unstable.
Recommendation
Overall, it is recommended for pesilat either winner
or loser to improve their motion skill to expertise. Coaches need to emphasize
the skill related fitness of and athlete to enhance their performance. There is
a limitation of this case study as the findings here only represent only four
silat match, so the findings cannot be generalised to all silat competition.
However, the purpose of this study was to analyse the winners motion skill
during a silat match. Furthermore, the system developed is useful in future
study in silat. This was the first study to provide descriptive detailed
information of a silat match, increasing the knowledge base and providing a
methodology that can be used in future research and by coaches. Furthermore,
the other sports where the frequency and duration of high intensity activity
periods fail to provide sufficient information to fully characterise the de minds
of the sport.
References
1.
Parnabas, V., Shapie, M. N. M., & Parnabas,
J. (2015). Level of drugs usage and sport performance in malay silat. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial
Arts Anthropology, 15(2), 45-51.
2. Shapie,
M. N. M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue, P., & Tong, R. (2014). Fitness
characteristics of youth silat performers. Journal
of Sports Science and Medicine, 1, 147-155.
3.
Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class A Final INA vs
VIE (Day 9) - 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015Website Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TogWi7jsKcU&t=25s
4.
Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class E Final VIE vs
MAS (Day 9) - 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015Website Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGK1CSVk0qs&t=1s
5.
Pencak Silat Tanding Women's Class C Final VIE
vs INA (Day 9) - 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015Website Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbTydViG6pU&t=2s
6.
Pencak Silat Tanding Women's Class D Final VIE
vs MAS (Day 9) - 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015Website Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8znlq-xjOzc
7.
Shapie, M. N. M., Oliver, J., O'Donoghue, P.,
& Tong, R. (2013). Activity profile during action time in national silat
competition (Vol. 4, pp. 81-86): Index Copernicus Ltd.
8.
Harris RA. A hand notation system designed to
record strike type and strike frequencies in Muay Thai (Thai boxing).
University of Wales Institute, Cardiff. Unpublished Thesis: 2005.
9.
Shapie, M. N. M. (2011). Influence of Age and
Maturation on Fitness Development, Trainability And Competitive Performance In
Youth Silat (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff Metropolitan University).
10.
Anuar AW. Teknik dalam seni silat melayu [In
Malay] (Technique in Silat Melayu). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka;
1992.
11.
Anuar AW. Silat olahraga: The art, technique and
regulations. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka; 1993
Email : Wellsaqil@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment